Teachers’ Perceptions on Communicative Grammar Testing and Test Item Alignment with Communicative Language Testing Principles in Selected Secondary Schools of North Shewa Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia

Authors

  • Ifa Gereshu Department of English Language and Literature, Madda Walabu University https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4046-7920
  • Tessema Tadesse Department of English Language and Literature, Madda Walabu University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20372/mwu.jessd.2026.1596

Keywords:

Communicative Grammar Testing, Teachers’ Perceptions, Test Item Analysis

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate teachers' perceptions of Communicative Grammar Testing and the extent to which test items reflect Communicative Language Testing principles. To achieve the study's objective, a descriptive research design with mixed-method approaches aligned with the pragmatist paradigm was employed. Questionnaires were used as the research instruments for the 74 Grade Ten English teachers in the 15 purposively selected secondary schools. Interviews were also conducted among 10 conveniently selected respondents. In addition, test item analysis was carried out to evaluate the communicativeness of grammar Testing. Quantitative data were analyzed through descriptive quantitative analysis using frequencies and percentages calculated through the SPSS version 27 program. The data collected through interviews were narratively analyzed. The findings of the study revealed that teachers have overall favorable perceptions of the Communicative Grammar Testing approach since they understand its value in the development of the students’ communicative competencies. However, the analysis of the items prepared for the test revealed partial implementation of the approach. Accurate and relevant challenges were identified, such as limited usage of context-based grammar tests, limited imaginative and flexible approaches, and limited focus on critical thinking and learner autonomy. The persistence of traditional rote memorization methods, for example, was identified as being potentially limiting for students' ability to apply grammatical rules to communicative situations. The study also recommends that schools provide professional development courses focusing on communicative grammar tests, context-based grammar tests, and flexible tests, along with critical thinking and learner autonomy, for students' best grammatical abilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

English Majors (TEM) in China. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 66,100898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.1 00898

Gloriez, P. (2022). Communicative language teaching and its implementation in online learning: The teachers’ voice. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 7(1), 157- 170. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v7i1.751

Gurmesa, D. B., Birbirs, D. T., Hussein, J. W., & Tsegaye, A. G. (2022). Ethiopian sec ondary school EFL teachers’ classroom assessment conceptions and practices from an activity theory perspective. East African Journal of Education Stud ies, 5(1), 105-116.

https://doi.org/10.37284/eajes.5.1.574

Jang, E. E., Wagner, M., and Park, G. (2014). Mixed methods research in language testing and assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, 123-153.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S026719051400 0063

Jovlievich, B. E. (2024). Review of Modern Technologies in Education. The Ameri can Journal of Social Science and Edu cation Innovations, 6(03), 35-36.

https://doi.org/10.37547/tajssei/vol ume06issue03-06

Kahsay, M. (2020). Secondary school teachers’ beliefs about grammar teaching in Ethio pia. Bahir Dar Journal of Educa tion, 20(1), 52-70.

Koca, S., Stavre, B., and Kacani, L. (2024). Ex ploring the Needs and Challenges in Teaching English Grammar Communi catively in Albanian Context. Interna tional Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 6(4), 261-273.

https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v6i4.1877

Kpeglo, S. B. (2024). Teachers’ Perceptions To wards Communicative Language Teach ing: A Study of English Tutors in Col leges of Education, Ghana. European Journal of English Language Teach ing, 9(1).

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v9i1.5352

Mihret, G., and Joshi, J. (2023). EFL Teachers’ Beliefs about Grammar Teaching and Classroom Implementation: Focus on Ankesha Senior Secondary and Prepara tory School Teachers in Ethiopia. Tuijin Jishu/Journal of Propulsion Technol ogy, 44(2), 2023.

https://doi.org/10.52783/tjjpt.v44.i2.992

Oranga, J., Matere, A., and Njurai, E. (2025). The Mixed Methods Research Approach: An Overview. Postmodernism Prolems, 15(1),84-99. https://doi.org/10.46324/pmp2501084

Parvaiz, G. S., Mufti, O., and Wahab, M. (2016). Pragmatism for mixed method research at higher education level. Business & Economic Review, 8(2), 67-79.

https://doi.org/10.22547/BER/8.2.5

Pregoner, J. D. (2024). Research approaches in education: A comparison of quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods. IMCC Journal of Science, 4(2), 31-36.

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5111007

Rothinam, N., Samuel, S. J. I., Vengasalem, R., & Naidu, S. (2024). Systematic literature review on factors influencing teacher motivation. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(5),2261-2281.

https://doi.org/10.29322/ijsrp.14.05.202 4.p14911

Setoodeh, K., Jadidi, E., & Rassaei, E. (2020). An In-Depth Exploration of EFL Teachers' Grammar Teaching Cognition. Interna tional Journal of Language Educa tion, 4(2), 309- 321. https://doi.org/10.26858/IJOLE.V4I2.13 935

Shah, S. S., Shah, A. A., and Khaskhelly, N. (2018). Pragmatism research paradigm: a philosophical framework of advocate ing methodological pluralism in social science research. Grassroots, 52(1), 90- 101.

Tadegew, T. M. (2024). Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices of Teaching Grammar Through Focus- on-Form and Context: The Case of EFL Teachers in Ethiopia Preparatory Schools. Science Journal of Educa tion, 12(6), 157-165.

https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.202412 06.15

Tesfaye, T., and Gebretsdik, A. (2024). Teach ers’ perceptions and practices of learner- centred grammar teaching methodology in selected secondary schools of Oromia special zone surrounding Fin finne. RATEIssues, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.69475/ratei.2024.1.5

Tewachew, A., Shiferie, K., and Tefera, E. (2024). Practices of EFL teachers in test construction. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2412496. Celtic: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics, 10(2), 172-193.

https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024. 2412496

Wado, M. S., and Seid, A. O. (2020). Exploring Challenges of Preparing Authentic Eng lish Language Tests in Secondary and Preparatory Schools: The Case of Gamo, Gofa and Konso Zones in Southern Ethi opia. Educational Research and Re views, 15(8), 433-437.

https://doi.org/10.5897/err2020.3965

Zulaiha, S., Mulyono, H., and Ambarsari, L. (2020). An Investigation into EFL Teachers' Assessment Literacy: Indone sian Teachers' Perceptions and Class room Practice. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 9(1), 189- 201.

https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2020. 1.189

Additional Files

Published

2026-03-02

How to Cite

Dabi, I. G., & Abebe, T. T. (2026). Teachers’ Perceptions on Communicative Grammar Testing and Test Item Alignment with Communicative Language Testing Principles in Selected Secondary Schools of North Shewa Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia. Madda Walabu University Journal of Equity in Sciences and Sustainable Development, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.20372/mwu.jessd.2026.1596

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.